watching movies is more enjoyable than reading books
It has been an endless debate whether watching movies is more enjoyable than reading fiction. To an extent this may seem as a pointless argument, however furthening into the subject can be estimulating to our minds, and may change the way we look at books. I strongly believe that books brings more joy than movies, for it is more emotionally impactful.
Firstly, it is known that movies, most of the times, have a shorter story than books; An average movie lasts around one hour and a half, whereas a book can range from 300-600 pages on average- and sometimes have over 1,000 pages. Books tend to be longer because for the cinematic market it is not beneficial to make really long movies, for people don’t have the time to watch them in one sit. Based on this information we can claim that books have more room to develop a plot and its characters. This is an advantage in the simplest way: Having more space to explain a character’s personality and background makes the process of catharsis more meaningful for the reader.
Secondly, even though a movie may be seen as more entertaning for its visual resources, a book offers a better scenary: Imagination. Instead of watching a screen with the ambientation the movie’s director wants you to see, you can create your custom environment that fits your liking. By using imagination you place the story in your mind, and save it there with all your memories; On the other hand, by watching a movie, you will only remember the most visually astonishing parts of the whole story. Therefore, you create a bond with the story when you imagine it.
To summarize, books have a more pleasing effect on people than movies. This is because reading doesn’t have the boundries movies have, namely plot development limit, and predetermined ambientation for the story.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-23 | rodriannnn | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | baishuhang2020 | 90 | view |
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 78
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? 60
- ecotourism environment 3
- ECO TOURISM 3
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90675241158 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74011210509 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581993569132 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2932230427 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347821463114 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136500920275 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129266011134 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225730446186 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960880148343 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.