The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character
Throughout history, vogue has been one of the inseparable parts of human being life. There have always been elites who have had a hand in fashion, which nowadays is a form of industry comprised of designers, models, fabric producing factories, and so on. According to every product life cycle, what makes fashion this mature industry is not just a one-dimensional affair. Needless to say, clothes are categorized in the essential needs of a human being. Besides this, the way one dresses indicates the way their attitude is. The following paragraphs will support this viewpoint by shedding light on it by means of two reasons.
First and foremost, researchers have validated a branch of psychology which is based on the cognition of one’s appearance. Although many hold contradictory viewpoints toward this type of psychology, the reasons behind it are convincing. According to appearance psychology, even one’s most profound moods and desires can be inferred from some appearance-related parameters like the colors of their clothes; for instance, usually sad people’s tendency is toward wearing dark clothes, the formality of their clothes which means tidy people are mostly into wearing more formal dresses. However, these are not for guarantee but still can tell about one’s personality in general.
Secondly, several publishments proving that a person’s way of dressing mostly stems from such indicators like society level, family, culture, and wealth condition are extent. Thus, just by looking at one’s appearance, all indicators mentioned above can easily be inferred by which gusses, not judgments, can be made. For instance, it can be inferred whether someone is tidy or messy, cares a lot or not, is loyal to the culture or not, or even their state of being religious or not, and so on. Needless to say, these were general categories, but this is not dubious that to many people, the clothes they wear are like fingerprints, which makes them their idiosyncrasy; therefore there are many things to understand by looking at these people’s dressing preferences.
To sum up, clothes are not just a set of fabrics that play a preserving role whenever a person contends to society or is not a means of being warm in winter. Clothes are substantial material of, generally speaking, a nation's culture, specifically speaking, a person’s personality or character.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-10 | meet96301 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | nph | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | sara.ana | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-06 | Yagya Limbu | 81 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28157894737 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95235832303 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571052631579 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9691559323 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4375 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137150020568 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472423340233 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693911976786 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836960728441 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249259261636 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.