When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
At society that is highly developed, people got less chance to talk to each other face to face since social medias come out and thrived in internet market. However, school projects or working events require more communication and efficiency to accomplish a great and satisfying project. I agree more on have a meeting about a project instead of sending emails.
Sending email is a way of conforming and messaging the information to everyone in the group. Email only send massages contend texts and sometimes images, but it could not transport one’s preferences and emotions as good as face to face conversations and it could cause a lot of extra misunderstanding which could cause low quality of the work. At beginning of the school year, we need to decide which project we like to chose for our group. At first, everyone said they are ok with either one in the list we have at our email box, so I picked a random one. However, after we met for the project, I found everyone has their own preference they could even cope well together, but everyone tend to show their modesty in the email, so our group did not do very well on this topic because no one is interested about it.
Have face to face conversation is more effective too. Every one has their own busy day to worry about, when a project is not at the deadline, and there is no one checking on the progress, then it would more likely to be down at the last minute. Discussion about the project is more effective because there would be a clear arrange to everyone in the team at the same time, no one would misunderstand their jobs and also time saving. Group members get together and disscuse it at one time and save a lot time on checking emails and rembering their own works. We had a literature project at our school before last summer vacation. Teacher told us to find a book everyone in the group likes and make a poster about it, and we need have it down before next semester begin. Since everyone is at vacation, we hardly have everybody in town the same time, so we decided to use emails. But every one seems to busy on their life or totally forgot about it. So, we finished it at the last day before school and it did not turn out great.
Time saving, arrange, and agreement about project are the lead of the quality of it, it would work perfectly on having a good project and easy communication.
- Some people believe that video games could inspire young students1 interest and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and a waste of time, so young students should be allowed to play video games 73
- because of climate change, more and more land that was once used to 80
- Television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed. 76
- Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: they may be navigating by the stars, 73
- One can know a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
... everyone in the group. Email only send massages contend texts and sometimes images, but...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1029, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e school and it did not turn out great. Time saving, arrange, and agreement abou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52546296296 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49525870705 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493055555556 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.937087194 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.611111111 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166037936956 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651836617227 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072095996139 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141791424628 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552404778348 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.