When doing group projects, some people are allowed to choose anyone they wish for; others are allowed to choose those who think differently from them. Which do you think is more effective?
Working in a group has always been considered as one of the most effective ways to carry out our plans, but people do have different views when talking about what kinds of person we should work with. Some claim that working with people who think differently from us offers more advantages than with people who have the same ideas with us, for they are more likely come up with more creative ideas. I, however, think it a huge misunderstanding. Working with people we like or have the same opinions with us provides more possibilities.
Working with people who has different views with us would waste us a lot of precious time, for we have to spend many hours on discussing the plan or quarreling with each other. And even if it is easy for us to achieve a agreement with the plan, talking about how to carry out the plan also cost us a lot of time. For example, the French football team behaved badly on the 2010 world cup, for the team members have different views, so were the coaches, thus, they could hardly come up with an effective strategy to operate in the football field. Although this team did not lack famous and talented players, they went back home without scoring.
One the contrary, the partners who shear the same idea with us offers more opportunities and possibilities for us to succeed. They are so easy to reach consensus, and there is no need for them to spend too much time talking about meaningless things, such as which plan is better or how to carry the plan. The only thing they should do is to devoted themselves to the progress of the project. When I was a student in university, my teacher who taught us engineering lessons asked us to attend a math modeling competition. I chose to work with tow of my best friends, Yang Muxi and Guo Zhenghe. We are roommates and knew each other well. It took us only our 2 hours to figure out the plan and make a detailed writing outline. In the later period, we carried out out plan well and wrote a prefect essay on the project. Finally, we got the first price in this competition.
In a word, working with people who shear the same ideal with us would offer us much more possibilities to succeed.
- When doing group projects, some people are allowed to choose anyone they wish for; others are allowed to choose those who think differently from them. Which do you think is more effective? 70
- Do you agree or disagree: it is easier for parents to raise their children today than 50 years ago. 73
- Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes In this way students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures Do you think it is an ef 82
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today Do you agree or disagree with the statement 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd even if it is easy for us to achieve a agreement with the plan, talking about ...
^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shear the same idea with us offers more opportunities and possibilities for us t...
^^
Line 3, column 757, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: out
...utline. In the later period, we carried out out plan well and wrote a prefect essay on ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47474747475 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46713423873 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517676767677 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0699050702 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168787297002 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568655531504 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495365602466 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111234851252 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540345835315 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.