Some university teachers prefer to record their lectures before classes. In this way, students will be familiar with the lecture in advance and teachers help students practice in classes while they are watching or listening lectures. Do you think it is an effective way to learn?
The quality of the college education, in some ways, determines the future of a nation and everyone pays a close attention on it. In university, some professors prefer to introduce the topic in the class and then teach students about it in details. However, some other professors tend to record their lecture before class, and give students a chance to learn about it by themselves first. From my perspective, I believe that the latter choice would be more effective way for university education.
Knowing the topic before classes and preparing for it, students might have more possibilities and opportunities to train their self-learning ability. Before classes, students would have to gather the information about the topic, which will be discussed in classes, and link their own knowledge to the topic. For example, when I was in the college, my advanced math teachers always give us his recorded lecture before classes and asked us to prepare for it. At first, I find it extreme hard, for I did not know where to find the information for the next class and what the relationship between this topic and my own knowledge. However, things had changed after a semester, I gradually formed my own self learning style and when I come troubles when studying, I have a clear mind about how and where I could find the answers. So, without my math teachers, I will never own my ability to learn by my self.
Besides students, teachers will be benefits from this teaching styles, making full use to time in classes. After giving recorded lecture and asking students prepare for it, teachers will not have to introduce some important but can be easily learned by oneself information during class, thus, they can make full use of time during classes. For a student major in physics, after preparing for the class, he would already understand the importance and historic background of the physics, as a result, during the class, he or her teachers could devote themselves to teaching students about the important theories of physics and how we can adopt it to the betterment of our society. Also, the precious time during classes could be taken by teachers and students to discussed about more meaningful topics. Therefore, teachers will not have to prepare too much about those unimportant information.
In conclusion, the recorded lecture should be given to students before students in order to given them the chance to learn by themselves, and to make full use of time during the classes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on young children’s education than on university education. 81
- Do you agree or disagree: it is easier for parents to raise their children today than 50 years ago. 73
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today Do you agree or disagree with the statement 68
- Agree or disagree: In order to success in study or job，the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or in a field of study. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94736842105 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67177650429 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468899521531 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6186609316 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301364473029 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11359352024 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687439459882 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202455781816 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357040524025 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.