When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effective than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the improvement of human’s knowledge, attentions and investigations of psychologists around pedagogic strategies as a key factor for the preparation of kids to have a better life have been raised. Through the years, there is a heated controversy between psychologists and consultants around various kinds of teaching strategies and the effects of them on kids and their future. In numerous circles of psychologists and teaching experts, whereas some are inclined toward the opinion that the students learn much more effective when they are asked to work alone, on the other extreme of the rope, opponents believe that the students learn much more effective when they are asked to work together. While both sides have their own positions, I for one from my vantage point, the latter attitude carries more weight. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
First of all, it is significant to be mentioned that one of the concerns of a developed country is improving the quality of teaching strategies and the governments should invest in setting up new teaching strategies for a better future. Accordingly, various scholar centers have been established. One of the poor teaching strategies that these days have faced trenchant criticism said: Students must work on projects individually because, work they in groups, some of them don’t attend to project and they will learn less. On the other side, some psychologists believe that the advantages of groupwork are much more than its disadvantages. They sincerely believe that if teachers let students do their projects as teamwork, they can divide work between themselves and per capita do some work that interested on it, furthermore, they would learn how to pulling together and prepare for a promising future. In addition, psychologists solved the problem of lazy students that didn’t participate in activities. They suggested to teachers use some policy of carrots and sticks for these kinds of students. Indeed, students can participate in groups activities and in addition enjoy the work they like, learn how to do teamwork.
The second aspect of the current discussion that demands an intense mediation is that children, as futurists of the country, are spent a lot of time in schools and their ethical features have been forming from school, thus, it is vital to have an effective education system to prepare them for a rosy future. At the present time, with the development of human’s modern society and specialization of work, it realizes more than before that in order to move work forward, we need teamwork. To fulfill such a need, we must learn to our children teamwork from school. Teachers can encourage students to groupwork by giving them projects on which students must work together, these work help children to get ready for the future.
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effective than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effective than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, furthermore, if, second, so, thus, whereas, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2390.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20697167756 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89734629553 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494553376906 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.8660732279 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.588235294 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333258118701 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102305638616 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117912010728 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230670035061 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218273383594 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.