When you do the charity, do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution?
doing charity is a common responsibility of our generation because we live in a world which is more connected than any time in the history of humankind. When donating for charity, some prefer to spend the money by themselves to ensure that the charity is given to ones in need, others give the money to charitable organizations to handle it. I, personally, prefer the latter for two reasons, which will be discussed in the following essay.
To begin with, charitable organizations have access to a wide range of people who need financial assistance. we, as normal citizens, might know a handful of the poor, while charitable institutions have great databases of those in need. Therefore, they are the most valid source in terms of helping numerous inable people. For instance, the Mahak charity has data of more than two million people who rely on others' help to survive. Additionally, charitable organizations are able to prioritize people who require immediate help and deal with them first. For the example of mahak, they have the policy of helping those who need food providing first, then helping those who need shelter, and others come after. normal citizens would not be able to make such distinctions since they do not have access to those people and are not aware of their need level.
Secondly, charitable institutions are able to specialize their locus of attention. Nowadays, most charitable organizations help a specific group of people or focus on special problems that people deal with. For example, some help people who need financial support for their medical treatment, some help people to recover from addiction, some help people of a particular ethnic or religious background. By authorizing charities who specialize in helping certain people, we would be able to donate money to whom we consider to help.
All in all, I think we should let charitable organizations spend our money to help people. This is because, the institutions have access to a larger population of folks who need help, and we would be able to donate to communities that we desire.
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 60
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 60
- When you do the charity do you prefer to use the money by yourself or authorize the institution 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Doing
doing charity is a common responsibility of o...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...f people who need financial assistance. we, as normal citizens, might know a handf...
^^
Line 6, column 709, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Normal
...ho need shelter, and others come after. normal citizens would not be able to make such...
^^^^^^
Line 16, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k we should let charitable organizations spend our money to help people. This is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81610276492 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510144927536 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8918089157 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6875 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966764162235 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387830070226 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427784596741 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075560881121 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595075462952 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.