Which do you prefer? to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted (=accepted and started to use) them.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that technology has a paramount role in people’s life. These technologies such as state of art devices facilitate daily human activities. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who endorse or repudiate the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that waiting to purchase these devices after a certain time which they become common and old-fashioned is more beneficial than obtaining them after the first day of their entrance to the store for sale. Among a plentitude
of reason in support of this assertion, saving money and easily fixation could be picked out for further analysis. To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the importance of money in modern world, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that new devices in the first period of entrance to the markets are expensive, while after months their prices decrease significantly because of depleting their sale. Indeed, with the new recession, saving money is importance for people. Thus, they could postpone their desire to buy that device and after months acquiring that cheaper than the past. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students in markets unveiled the fact that the price of I-Phone decreases about 30 percent after the first day of Apple company's allowance to enter in markets. This example shows that delay in purchasing these new technologies could be economical In addition to the reason raised above, some common faults in the first day of showing of any devices could also substantiate the justifiability
of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction to the public belief, each new device has many faults in its design in its first exhibition. During the time and revealing these mistakes, companies try to improve their production and correcting these fault. Thus, it is better for us to wait for buying to adjust them and to tolerate lower wasting our time. Furthermore, we can use people’s help for learning to optimize exploit it since they had these devices earlier and are familiar with the using skills. For instance, last year I bought a new tablet of Sony company. I had some problem to install Office software on it. Thus, I decided to refer an expert in markets but because of some new changes in this new product, he could not help me and I forced to change it with an old model with lower facilities. Drawing upon of the above reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that it is better to postpone our buying new technologies. Not only it is beneficial for saving money but also it helps to fix some fault easily.
- Which one do you prefer students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class 83
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 37
- Which one do you prefer? students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe
- In times of an economic crisis, in which area should governments reduce their spending? 1. Arts 2. Scientific research 3. Parks and public gardens. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2448.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9156626506 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75497031814 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544176706827 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.8594858545 48.9658058833 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194113961003 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537851158744 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046337685302 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139763503601 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387486701163 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.