Companies use various ways to be more productive. In one strategy, the company makes a decision for effective that people who work there have a work environment which is free of noise and distractions. In addition, they know that they will be rewarded for their production. Moreover, they doing jobs that they are interested in. I surely believe that the company should choose the way for products that workers are knowing what they will be rewarded because they improve their working skills, collaborate with their colleges, and compete with other teams for the prize.
First, the worker makes an effort to brash up their working skills for their reword. Their skills are the center of efficiencies of the company, also provide the company more demands. For instance, one worker who wants to get reword does not better work than others because it is not enough knowledge to cope with their tasks. Then, they decide to read more detailed books for improving their work, so their wisdom of task is gradually getting better than others. Thus, their effort makes the company more productive.
Secondly, the efficiency of the company is improved by collaborations with workers for their reword. It is limited for people to think about new ideas alone, so they should make communication with other people. To take myself as example, I was the vice president when I was a high school student. In my high school, there was the only festival for students and teachers to provide people food. Then, I came up with an idea that the production of food was so inefficient, but I could not the best idea for dealing with this problem. Thus, I visited my professor and asked him to give me advice for completing this problem. From my exercise, each students’ work was better than in the past.
Finally, workers arduously compete with other teams for their reword. In the competition for a project, each team considers that they want to be better than other teams. Therefore, they rebuild their project in more beneficial ways such as cheap, easy to produce, attractive outfit and so on. As a result, the company will get more high demands and new supplies for this competition.
To sum up, I definitely believe that workers should be accompanied with that they will achieve extra money for their efficiency. Worker will improve their working skills, communicate with their colleges, and compete with other workers for their reword.
- To help the first year students adapt to new college life university has two plans One is to offer a week orientation The other is to ask to the freshman to meet with their senior year schoolmates regularly According to your opinions which plan is better 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 63
- 70
- 6 Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best A Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics B Help people who cannot afford to build o 70
- which do you think is the most important factor to improve people s work efficiencies 1 Having a work environment which is free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that they will be rewarded 3 Doing jobs they are interested in 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...hoose the way for products that workers are knowing what they will be rewarded because they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...hoose the way for products that workers are knowing what they will be rewarded because they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96568627451 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52122859294 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480392156863 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9702736997 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0869565217 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7391304348 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21518753014 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790428643039 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892250057396 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142832626634 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133216081094 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.