which one do you prefer? Why?1) a company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or2) another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days.

It is obvious that in today's fast-paced word humans are trying to find a good job in their life because a career plays a crucial role in people's life. They consider different factors when they decide to choose a job because of the fact that they will assign a great deal of their time to their job. Even though some people prefer to choose a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days, I strongly prefer to select a job with more challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days. In the following paragraphs I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
To begin with, I believe that when people have a job in which they deal with interesting and challenging tasks, it will help them to enjoy their job. In other words, they will learn a lot of new things by doing attractive and complex projects. Thus, it will enable them to improve their skills and knowledge about that field. Also, they will not be bored and tired by carrying out repeated and uninteresting activities. As a result, it will lead them to feel satisfied with their career. In fact, they view their job as an appealing vacation and they will not require a lot of vacation days because they will not be exhausted by doing their work at the workplace. For example, I have a job in a computer company. I face plenty of interesting and challenging projects; hence, I enjoy doing these projects and learn a lot of useful things and get much information. Also,I prefer to spend my vacation days on my workplace.
Moreover, I think when people do uninteresting work in their job, they will decrease their working efficiency. In other words, they will be tired by doing these tasks and will not have enough effectiveness. Therefore, even they have more vacation days, it will not benefit them a lot. Furthermore, due to the fact that they cannot improve their knowledge, it will face danger of losing their job. That is, they will not have a secure job, while people who do challenging jobs have more skills and information and thus they will have a secure job. For instance, my father' friend worked in a factory with a lot of vacation days. He did simple work without any challenges and also he did not have any interest in doing it. Therefore, he could make no progress in hie job and finally he was fired from the factory.
To sum up, according to the points and examples mentioned above, it is much beneficial for people to choose an interesting and challenging job than an uninteresting job even it has less vacation day.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...actors when they decide to choose a job because of the fact that they will assign a great deal of their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...improve their skills and knowledge about that field. Also, they will not be bored...
^^
Line 2, column 868, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...ul things and get much information. Also,I prefer to spend my vacation days on my...
^^
Line 2, column 886, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much information. Also,I prefer to spend my vacation days on my workplace. Moreo...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y will be tired by doing these tasks and will not have enough effectiveness. Ther...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61368653422 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5891094345 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437086092715 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 25.0 9.59856630824 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4019695936 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5909090909 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249863118592 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895676771487 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986882344895 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199974595723 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420190080656 0.0645574589148 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.