Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time? Why?
-They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong.
-They have similar interests and similar views on important topics.
-They trust each other completely.
The solitary nature of modern society makes people today increasingly lonely. Therefore, friendships become an inseparable component of people’s lives. From my perspective, sharing similar interests and similar views on major topics best helps form lasting friendships among the three options provided.
First, sharing similar interests bonds people closer. Most of the time, friends are there to accompany each other, meaning they will spend time doing things together. Without being interested in similar activities, it will be impossible for people to have quality time together, at least from a long-term perspective. The reason is that when people decide to do something together, many would have different opinions, making it hard to agree on what to do. Even if agreements sometimes occur, some must give in, doing things they do not enjoy. And when this happens frequently, people who always make concessions will probably hold some grudge against their friends, damaging their relationships. In contrast, friends with similar interests would have fun doing things together. Through time, this builds precious mutual memories, which, in turn, strengthens bonds among them, creating lasting friendships.
Second, having similar views enhances relationships among friends. The intricate nature of everyday life results in people’s varied perspectives about different issues. And when people realize that some of their friends are holding views opposing theirs, especially regarding sensitive topics, they might feel offended or disappointed. For example, environmental protectionists might be enthusiastic about preserving nature and would criticize any economic activity that places burdens on the environment. But what if their friends are more concerned about human lives threatened by famine or not having access to clean drinking water due to poverty? The only way to save those people from dying is through economic growth, which would almost always cause environmental problems. Both views are creditable to some extent. To be more precise, they cannot easily persuade each other. So, their relationships are likely to be doomed by disagreements or even criticisms against one another. However, if both friends hold similar views on things, they can avoid conflicts and sometimes even back their friends up when they have arguments with others. Ultimately, this friendly support enhances their friendships.
To conclude, sharing similar interests and views on things bonds people closer and avoids conflicts among friends, which eventually makes friendships long-lasting.
- Some people prefer to go shopping in a big supermarket Some people prefer to go shopping in small stores near the community Which do you prefer Explain why 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement You should always state your honest opinion even when you know that most other people disagree with your point of view Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take at least one course that teachers them the culture of other countries 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80104712042 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78445937335 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589005235602 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6296380223 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.347826087 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6086956522 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303390339977 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839383344704 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595817724563 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180000230786 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783511329599 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80104712042 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78445937335 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589005235602 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6296380223 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.347826087 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6086956522 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303390339977 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839383344704 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595817724563 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180000230786 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783511329599 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.