As we all know, human beings are social animals, and possessing a long-lasting friendship is beneficial to us. Nevertheless, when it comes to this topic, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that friends with the same commonality of interests enable the friendship to last for a long time, while others hold a different viewpoint that trust provides the foundation for a long-lasting friendship. As far as I am concerned, I believe friends who always give hands to us whenever we are facing a crisis are the prerequisites.
In the first place, as a renowned saying goes, "a friend in need is a friend indeed". A genuine friend can do a favor for you when you are facing either an emotional crisis or financial trouble, paving the way for the continuity of the relationship. To illustrate, when you are enduring too much pressure caused by earning money and living, this type of friend will be willing to sit beside you and listen to your complaints with patience. In front of him, you can vent your emotions with ease. When you are imposed too much financial burden, such as the expensive rental fee of an apartment, or you need some money for urgent affairs, this quintessential friend will put in your shoes and spare no efforts to help you to escape from this awful condition. With this kind of friendship, you can not only share happiness but also sorrow.
On the other hand, although it is undeniable that we can enhance the bond with friends with similar interests and viewpoints, this circumstance can change as we age. For example, when I was in primary school, a friend and I were obsessed with the magical world created by J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series. We always talk about the plots and characters day and night. But after entering the university, our interests enormously changed. I preferred doing some in-depth psychological research in my spare time, while my old friend was more committed to photography. After that, we were not able to exchange our ideas and interact with each other enthusiastically anymore, and the friendship gradually lost its spark after a while.
In addition, we must admit that trust is usually a cornerstone of a relationship, which can enhance a mutual friendship. Nevertheless, the fact that we attach great importance to trust does not justify that trust is the only and the most critical element of a friendship. Sometimes, a friend who totally trusts you but does not do any further action to lend a helping hand can hurt your heart more severely, thereby exposing more vulnerability to this relationship and eventually ruining it.
In a nutshell, we need to emphasize the significance of possessing friends who assist us when we are mired in trouble. This type of good companion can not only relieve our loneliness and pressure but also light the candle for us when we are walking in the darkness.
- Many organizations try to draw people s attention to serious problems such as climate change or poverty These organizations often use images photographs and videos to motivate people to take action against those problems Some organizations use sad images 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept criticism from others cannot be successful at working in a group 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future 73
- National governments can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environment Which ONE of the following three actions do you think is MOST important for a nation s government to take to protect the natural environment and why Fund research t 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should assign the homework to students every day 91
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90447154472 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89533287246 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522357723577 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.928194727 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.904761905 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214135576482 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643107311552 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664579293456 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122210185229 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864046846493 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.