It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition, the swift monumental scientific and technological achievements are resulted to experiencing hectic life. Indeed, these conditions have placed our social life in a dilemma so that we could not find enough time for spending with the people around us. By getting this in mind the most suitable ways for making friends and being in intimate gatherings are attending sports clubs, taking part in the community activities and traveling. Altogether, I wholeheartedly believe that the simple and efficient way of making a new friend is sport spots. The following essay takes an elaborating look at how getting acquainted with new individuals is highly preferred in sport areas.
There is no denying that being the contact for someone for a while the probability of creation of an emotional or sincere relation dramatically goes up. In fact, playing in the football or basketball team, joining a gym and participating in a mountain-climbing group engenders a close-knit atmosphere. Moreover, because the athletic sense among the members leads to a consolidated and helpful connection. Assuredly, due to the strict conditions are over on sportsmen they can be faithful and dedicated friends. Although selecting a friend from your sports teammate is strongly recommended, this type of friendship mostly not appropriate for a romantic relationship.
In this regard, artistic communities, due to its subtle instinct, provide an emotional and spiritual environment for members to easily fall-in-love. Young girls and boys by being at the exposure of instrumental state their body release endorphin and dopamine, through these internal chemical reactions they find a tendency to the opposite sex. Besides two expressed ways, there is another strategy for making a new friend who is traveling. Actually, traveling by tours also can lead to a friendship, but it may not take a long time and in most of the occasions it is temporary. Admittedly, while traveling with the tour you may become familiar with a person who is from another country; this issue weakens the continuity of camaraderie. A group of sociologists and psychologists gathered together at the ANU University to investigate the durability of relations in each stated type. Finally, they announced that the average times of bonds are 8, 6 and 1 year for making it from a sports team, social activities and traveling, respectively.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that all tree considered way can lead to the fellowship but its type may not be the same. The strongest bond is attributed to getting friends through sports.
- Agree or disagree: to solve the problem of present and future, it is necessary to understand the past. 90
- A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time. 90
- Some people like to work at home, while others prefer to work in the office. Which do you prefer and why 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of theirfamilies. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following the statement?Being creative rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution a problem. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
... not find enough time for spending with the people around us. By getting this in mind the most suita...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1041, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...activities and traveling, respectively. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, finally, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2366.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29306487696 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15712193066 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592841163311 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7412995822 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.3 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.35 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228494067806 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650301002463 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778853083068 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122912004898 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051966525154 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.