wildlife of birds
According to the article, it clams humans’ growth population, agricultures expansion and using of pesticides contributing birds’ populations decline. On contrast, on the authority of the lecture, it does not agree with this statement for the following reasons.
To begin with, the passage claims that humans’ societies growth led to birds’ populations decrease because of the building more cities, malls, high building and offices. That decrease the wildlife of birds. In the oppositions to, the lecture disagrees with this statement. She reveals the growth of humans’ expansions have numerous benefits for bird by providing a plenty of food between buildings and streets like rats. Moreover, she said some species of bird will shrink but, more of them will grow.
Furthermore, according to the reading, it claims the expansion of agriculture by occupied more lands will destroy the habitats area of birds. Nevertheless, the lecturer counterclaims using the lands for agricultures decrease every year by increasing the productivity of the land cubic area, due to planting a different type of crops. At the end, there are no requirements to destroy the wildlands.
Moreover, according to the article, the pesticides have a harmful effect on most of birds’ species. In addition to it may poison the water nearby and the insects. On the contrary, the lecture said most of the pesticides are in market today have much less concentration of chemicals and less harmful for water and insects. Furthermore, there are many transgenic plants that have resistant to insects attractive; moreover, in this case there are no need for using pesticides. As a result, there are no effect on birds’ habitats or their wildlife.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-06 | mattayousak | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 3
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement people who develop many different skill have more successful life than people who focus on one skill only 60
- umans growth population agricultures expansion and using of pesticides contributing birds populations decline summarize all the pint in the lecture and the passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habitats'' or 'habitat's'?
Suggestion: habitats'; habitat's
...by occupied more lands will destroy the habitats area of birds. Nevertheless, the lectur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the birds') or simply say ''most birds''.
Suggestion: most of the birds; most birds
...the pesticides have a harmful effect on most of birds’ species. In addition to it may poison ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38970588235 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9627152514 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9633426787 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7333333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184914352519 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644180782315 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783314149473 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994834293569 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800209613324 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.