Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday rather than when they do similar tasks all day long.
By and large, working is one of the most important parts of everybody life. It is owing to the fact that people spend most of their time at work, so it is crucial for them to have a job which they like. In this line of thought, some people believe a job with a plethora of tasks is more satisfying than a job with routine and repetitive tasks. Personally speaking, I concur with the statement, and in the following lines, I will substantiate my point.
To begin with, a job with diverse tasks is more interesting for people than a simple job. Doing different tasks along a day lowers the exhaustion of the work, and let people continue their work more vibrant. It is an intrinsic feature of humankind that diversity brings about more energy and dynamic for them. Moreover, when people supposed to do a lot of different things, they need to communicate with different coworkers, which is more satisfying as people like to have a social relation during the workday. My experience is a case in point. When I worked at an investment company after my graduation, I used to do a single task that was really frustrating. After a while, I asked my supervisor to give more things to do and also more responsibilities. Not only did my eagerness toward the job have increased, but also I have done my tasks more efficiently. When I was tired of doing a task, I switched to another one, which helped me to keep my enthusiasm all day. If I had not changed my job situation, I might have resigned a long time ago.
The second reason is that complex work helps people to learn a variety of useful things. The more different tasks people do, the more skills and knowledge they learn. When employees have a lot of work to do, they eventually need to reach different skills and increase their understandings about the work. This feature not only enhances their motivation but also benefits them in the future as they were equipped with competitive abilities. Take, for instance, when a worker has gained a great skill set in a working area, he would have higher bargaining power, and he could get promotion very easily or find a job with better compensations as a result. Moreover, knowing a lot of things increases people creativity and also reinforce their interest to learn more, which lead people to feel more satisfied and pleased. Therefore, a job with regular functions could kill employees' motivation.
In summary, all the aforementioned reasons above bring us to the conclusion that a job having a different kind of duties is more enthusiastic than a job without any different roles. It is because the complex job is more interesting, and help workers to obtain different abilities.
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmf 80
- Which one do you prefer? Why?1) A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or2) Another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days. 86
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees and 77
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in summary, kind of, as a result, by and large, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7249466951 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78413060034 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496801705757 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0282558657 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.347826087 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3913043478 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3399353587 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103617582985 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912441819769 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20501505972 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101220883648 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.