Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
It is definitely true. Humans does not like to do any task every day without any change. As an analogy, consider that transportation engineers embed lots of curves in a road when they are designing it; The work sounds like the road and some changes in the duty are the curves. By the way, there are some reasons to support my opinion as follows:
Firs of all, neural issues are so important to have a high efficiency manufacturing and conquring the market. If employees and the capitalists are to gain more profits than others, it means defeating the rivals, should pay enough attention to this subject. A boring task makes its responsible reluctant to work hard and moreover, the exist efficiency not only would not increase, but also would fall down dramatically. Doing the same task during months or years is a paradigm of such mistakes that lead to neural problems and following it, economic issues.
The second reason is that people like to be different from their past. Imagine a hotshot guy which is the best in education and work; Finally, some days, he would be bothered from this life trend; Even fail, lose, or other damages could make him happy. Being a human sounds difficults from this viewpoint but it is reality and shifting from a good situation, like ample worth, a lucky person, to a worse situation is spiritually useful let alone wiseversa! So this intrinsic property of us, tending to be different from past, could be meet by changing task for example in a factory.
Dealing with new challenges is a way to be rescued from sadnesses and concerns. A man who is a workers and is not a wealthy guy, probably has lots economic problems; When he is transferred to other departments of the factory, he would forget them for a while. Some other pleaures there are underneath of this change. The main consequence of that is leaving over the bad memories which the person had experienced at the farmer part. All in all, improving spiritual condition is the other factor of justifying this change.
As a summary, empoyees are getting used to taking advantages of scientific researches to increase their efficiency. According to some academic researches, I have read in a website, making the life different and colorful can affect the quality of your life. Someone who is rigorous about himself or herself to practice something more and more during years or days, it might be pertended that this is the diligence; But I think this is a torture. I like to say that if I was an employee, No one would not has to do the same task in awek and my orkers would be free to change their ask and be outonomus; Because the profit is so iiiportat for me.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 85
- Tpo 35 integrated 3
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...le reluctant to work hard and moreover, the exist efficiency not only would not increase,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... if I was an employee, No one would not has to do the same task in awek and my orke...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, so, while, as to, for example, i think, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6858974359 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6418440839 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0188176668 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.421052632 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6315789474 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173164377574 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455947459439 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418524072752 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947198384085 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434601385796 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.