Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Since the dawn of human civilization, humans have seek to do tasks both for the creativity of their brains and their daily needs such as food, water and health, to name but three. a controversy exists as whether doing different types of tasks lead to satisfaction or doing similar types of them. Some people believe that doing different types of task can lead to satisfaction in that job, while others believe otherwise. I , myself, subscribe to the former ones for a few reasons, two of substantial ones of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, doing similar tasks can be boring and there is not much challenging things to be involved in. for example, workers in the cloth factory who are responsible for coloring the cloth, spend the whole of their working hours taking care of the colors for the costumes and eventually they will be tired of doing this task and will look for a new task that can bring more activity which they are satisfied with and can use other parts of their brain in that task. On the other hand, doing many tasks during the workdays make them to have high productivity and feel happy in workplace.
Second, people have latent talents that they need to flourish them by doing tasks that they have not done before. By doing so, they discover their abilities that lead to an inner satisfaction. For Instance, in college, students take different courses such as physics, mathematics, arts, to name but a few, for finding out their talents and strong points so that they can be specified in a particular subject which is their interest and make them more satisfied and happy.
In summary, with all this taken into consideration, doing different type of tasks results in more satisfaction than doing a similar task. It is an amazing time that how a person find out about his hidden talents by involving in various tasks and utilizing most of their brains’ parts..
- The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 90
- All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study. 76
- Some people like to record their life by sharing pictures and other information on social-networking sites. Others keep this information to themselves and never share it online. Which do you prefer? 76
- Modern agriculture does damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sought'.
Suggestion: sought
...dawn of human civilization, humans have seek to do tasks both for the creativity of ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...d, water and health, to name but three. a controversy exists as whether doing dif...
^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t job, while others believe otherwise. I , myself, subscribe to the former ones fo...
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ilizing most of their brains' parts..
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77575757576 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53681826704 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542424242424 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1132991238 48.9658058833 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409503241648 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171773196906 0.076458572812 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106960065388 0.0737576698707 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263898433287 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311310239507 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.