You should not discuss about social or political views with friends
Having a discussion with your friend is always interesting and a fun thing to do because you could see what is in their mind about the subject. With that being said, I feel that discussing about social issues or political views with your friends are a fantastic idea. Here's why I feel that way.
To begin with, having a talk with your friends about political view is very interesting because many people has different political view than yourself. With that you can learn more about other people opinion about political differences. I have a personal experience to illustrate this. About a month ago I was having a discussion with my friend. We were talking about politics of our country, which I feel is really bad. However, he disagreed with me saying that politics in our country is in excellent condition. I am very confused on why he said that. After a relatively long talk with him, explaining why political condition in our country is in good condition, although I did not all agreed with him I can conclude that not all political aspects in my country is bad. Having discussion like this with your friend can expand your knowledge about current political condition.
Additionally, talking about social issues with your friend is also beneficial. Because having a talk about it you can do something about social issues that are happening around you. For example, you and your friends are having to discuss about recent flood disaster that's affecting a small region in your state, which cause shortage of food, medicine, and hygiene products to the people there. With a discussion like this you and your friends will be motivated to help those people in needs by doing a charity or fundraiser to help them, this action will have a positive impact to them. This way you can change social issues around you with the help of your friends for a better condition.
To summarize, discussing with your friends about social and political views will open your eyes about new knowledge and events that are occurring around you.
- You should not discuss about social or political views with friends 78
- Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Compare the advantages of these two different w 70
- It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Plants can provide food, shelter, clothing or medicine. What is the one kind of plant that is important to you or the people in your country? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es with your friend is also beneficial. Because having a talk about it you can do somet...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... to discuss about recent flood disaster thats affecting a small region in your state,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, so, for example, i feel, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87608069164 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52382118291 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472622478386 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5315781591 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5366568013 0.236089414692 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212142728735 0.076458572812 277% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142232220079 0.0737576698707 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.419373997013 0.150856017488 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04959181401 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.