22:16
收藏
反馈
Directions: You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
题目原文：
In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, frogs help play a role in protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects. Several methods have been proposed to solve the problem of declining frog populations. First, frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. Pesticides often spread from farmland into neighboring frog habitats. Once pesticides enter a frog’s body, they attack the nervous system, leading to severe breathing problems. If laws prohibited the farmers from using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog populations, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs. A second major factor in frog population decline is a fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. The fungus causes thickening of the skin, and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, infected frogs die of dehydration. Recently, researchers have discovered several ways to treat or prevent infection, including antifungal medication and treatments that kill the fungus with heat. Those treatments, if applied on a large scale, would protect sensitive frog populations from infection. Third, in a great many cases, frog populations are in decline simply because their natural habitats are threatened. Since most frog species lay their eggs in water, they are dependent on water and wetland habitats. Many such habitats are threatened by human activities, including excessive water use or the draining of wetlands to make them suitable for development. If key water habitats such as lakes and marshes were better protected from excessive water use and development, many frog species would recover.
The author of reading state that frogs are very useful for humanity. These days, plenty frog scpecies reduce in number or gone extinct. The author provide 3 solution to prevent this issue. however, the lecturer refutes each solution and provide some reason for it.
The author state that if we using pesticides, frogs will harmed. The professor contents by saying that farmers by using pedticides provide more crops. if we don't using them we will have some problems.
The author claim that the fungus harm frog's skin, an important part of frogs to absorb water, and according to reasearchers we can use antifungal medication for frogs. The speaker, on the other hand, explains that we should use this method for every single frog. if we capture every frogs, it will be very complicated and will need large amount of money. Also, for any offspring of frogs we should do it again. She believe that it is very expensive and complicated.
The author explains that frogs depends on water resources and humans shoud decrease using of water for industry and development. however, The speaker was not sure that this activities use much water. The professor state that global warming is the biggest threat for dimminish water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ovide 3 solution to prevent this issue. however, the lecturer refutes each solution and...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
...that if we using pesticides, frogs will harmed. The professor contents by saying that ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...by using pedticides provide more crops. if we dont using them we will have some pr...
^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...by using pedticides provide more crops. if we dont using them we will have some pr...
^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ng pedticides provide more crops. if we dont using them we will have some problems. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... use this method for every single frog. if we capture every frogs, it will be very...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ing of frogs we should do it again. She believe that it is very expensive and complicat...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... of water for industry and development. however, The speaker was not sure that this act...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... however, The speaker was not sure that this activities use much water. The professo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96585365854 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38071770181 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590243902439 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.53522556 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8666666667 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06452816374 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0256776768145 0.272083759551 9% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0108913802738 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0198782305528 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0177594543579 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136559841936 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.