abcd

Essay topics:

abcd

The companies in the reading hold a standpoint that the new regulation for coal ash is meaningless. On the contrary, the professor claims an opposing idea that the regulation of coal ash has to be created. And in the lecture, she uses three specific points to support her idea.

First, in the reading, companies claim that there is already a regulation, like handling coal ash must in a new fill pound. the professor argues in the lecture that the old regulation is insufficient. This is because the liner does not ask companies to dispose old fill pound which already could make huge damage for environment,

Moreover, the statement claimed in the reading passage is that the strict laws for coal ash may hamper recycle coal ash to other products. Contrary to it is the professor’s opinion that the recycle products like mercury do not be affected by strict laws. After having rules for handling and restoring it, consumers still use the mercury products and very safety.

Finally, unlike the saying that the strict rules will increase the cost for companies and consumers in the passage, the lecturer advocate that those rules indeed increase the cost for companies. However, after analyse the cost, consumers only need to pay 1 percent and enjoy cleaner environment.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-14 1261906566 3 view
2018-09-27 vampypandya 3 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ling coal ash must in a new fill pound. the professor argues in the lecture that th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, as to, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05633802817 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67822990552 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.062121904 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.7 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.