The article discusses about the life of group of marine animals named "Agnostids". Based on the fossil information, the author proposes different theories about the life of agnostids. The lecture, however, says that the theories are dubious and contradicts them.
Firstly, the free swimming predators have large and well developed vision to catch their prey. But, the agnostids are small and they have tiny pored eyes, which makes it complicate to prey on other fish. Also, the lecture says that there is no statement about the vision based on the fossil record. This casts doubt that the agnostids are the predators.
Furthermore, Sea dwellers are fast and they have the ability to move place to place in short time. Whereas, the agnostids are the slow moving marine animals and they stay only in their localized area. This contradicts the point that they are sea dwellers.
Finally, the reading claims that the agnostids may have the posibility of being parasites and living on other animals. The lecture opposes this argument, based on the size of the agnostids, they do not have the chance of being a parasite. Parasites are smaller and they populate very quickly. Also, considering the size of the agnostids, too many might kill the host organisms. Thus, specific argument about agnostids being parasites has been proved wrong by the lecture.
- Question:-> Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.Reading Passage:->Scant physical evidence remains of the first human domestication of grain. Still, there is enough to conclu 61
- Agree or Disagree with the following statementTelevision advertising directed toward young children (ages 2 to 5) should be prohibited.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Suppression of forest fire - integrated essay 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article discusses about the life of grou...
^^
Line 9, column 343, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: much might; a good deal of might
...sidering the size of the agnostids, too many might kill the host organisms. Thus, specific...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17567567568 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68346380729 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.6875163645 49.2860985944 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.6 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190785109905 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063913344775 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607156080027 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113562836559 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264033860884 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.