the appearance of professors on the television and its advantages and disadvantages
The text discusses the appearance of professors on the television and states that besides professors, students and the society can benefit from this activity. On the other hand, the professor goes against stated claims and by providing some contradictory explanation states why she disagrees with the author.
First, the text claims that the appearance of professors on the television can get reputations as some knowledgeable and expert scholars for them, and it can also help them to be known by more number of people. In contrast, the professor states that their presence on the television is not good for them from professional point. She continues that if a professor participate in television, other scholars may not count on him as a fully scholar and think that he has chosen the entertainment industry instead on research. Moreover, she mentions that this can lead to having more difficulties for getting funds which is a big disadvantage for a professor.
Second, the author claims that the presence of a professor in different TV shows can be beneficial for universities. It includes that when more people know a professor,the reputation of the university will increase, and it can receive more donations. In addition, more students will apply for the university which can be a good result. However, the professor refutes this claim and states that TV shows take lots of time of professors for traveling, getting ready for the program or making up before the shows, and these all decline the time which he could dedicate to his students and also brings some other problems as a consequence.
Third, the text claims that people can learn from professors who are experts and it can increase the knowledge of the society. In this way, it claims that professor by participating in TV shows can help the society. On the other hand, the professor rejects this claim and states that the effect of their presence on the TV shows is not clear. She explains that although professors are knowledgeable and can teach well, people normally do not need all topics in depth as much as professors provide. We can also hear from her that Television programs just need some academic topics and all th information can be acquired and presented by reporters who had some study on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-08 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | wqx | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | heman@saini | 68 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | Mahimoon | 65 | view |
| 2021-07-15 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
- Torreya taxifoha population and three ways to save them 73
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- living in dorm or apartment? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and ex 73
- do you prefer to be a leader or a member of a team 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('fully') instead an adjective, or a noun ('scholar') instead of another adjective.
... other scholars may not count on him as a fully scholar and think that he has chosen the entert...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...s that when more people know a professor,the reputation of the university will incre...
^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s that people can learn from professors who are experts and it can increase the knowled...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, well, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 382.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98429319372 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84096428972 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460732984293 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9458692615 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4666666667 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186131181678 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787637223766 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047016258504 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134234590199 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433481577079 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.