Is to assemble group of people into a team best way to approach a new project
The reading and the lecturer is about how to approach a new project. The author, in regard to passages, is supporting the idea of group of members handling a project and supports his position by providing three arguments. The lecturer was quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in author’s claims. In fact, he believes that group of members causes delays to the projects, and addresses, in detail trouble linked to each argument made in the reading text.
To begin with, the author mentions that with group of members handling projects, there will be a lot of knowledge and expertise to accomplish a task. Nevertheless, the speaker contradicts this by stating that some of the team members just gets a free ride as they don’t contribute much to the project and they don’t get any benefit from team appreciations. Moreover, he suggests that individuals who have worked are not recognized and thus there is change in their attitude.
Secondly, the author claims that due to group work on different tasks, it takes less time to finish them up. Next, he brings up that this results in a creative solution to finish up a task. Yet, the speaker challenges the author’s claim by revealing that with group of members working, it takes time to come to a consensus about a discussion which delays the projects further.
Finally, the author wraps his arguments by positing that with group of people working an individual is not accounted for any decision going wrong. As a result, it helps to take risky decisions which otherwise would not have been taken by an individual. Not surprisingly, in contrast to writer’s claim, the speaker puts forth that many times, one or two members from a time have influence over other team members. This results in their decision being followed across the team even if, those decisions can be wrong and can results in failure of the project. This can result in every team member being held responsible for the failure of project.
To sum up, both the author and the lecturer has conflicting views regarding group of members handling projects. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this.
- Is to assemble group of people into a team best way to approach a new project 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. 73
- Use of buildings of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico 80
- Implementation of four day work week. 80
- Implementation of four day work week. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... position by providing three arguments. The lecturer was quick to point out that th...
^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...peaker contradicts this by stating that some of the team members just gets a free ride as t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 527, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...f, those decisions can be wrong and can results in failure of the project. This can res...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, in fact, as a result, in contrast to, in regard to, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9539295393 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67298258371 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531165311653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1242526041 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.529411765 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160529705082 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544580183081 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537199828466 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867751355205 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354754981311 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.