In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.
Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.
The response gave the disadvantages of working in groups based on a research conducted on the efficacy of team projects as opposed to the position of the passage. The research revealed how various members of a group make different levels of contributions to the success of a projects yet they all receive same recognition especially in the case of members that contribute very little. This view cast a dark look on the all-members recognition advocated for by the passage. While the passage claims that team projects are faster to execute, the research shows how this is not the case at times. Team projects can take long to execute due to the lengthy time usually spent before a consensus is reached.
Moreover, the research pointed out how during the execution of a team project, there are members whose opinions or consent to a strategy hold more sway that others, leading the team to select a less than optimal plan or as the case may be, a terrible one. Also, the other members in the group whose superb ideas were not followed get to partake in the blame as well when the project ends up a failure. In essence, the professor demonstrated through the research that working in groups may not be the best policy for a company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...vels of contributions to the success of a projects yet they all receive same recognition e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70833333333 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60716391303 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2838316168 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.125 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146362468225 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625992791195 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022695522386 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115173632916 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00161377220535 0.0443174109184 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.