In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. the professor disagrees with this idea. why?
Many organizations substitute to the idea of making people into groups for certain projects. They believe having a team offers many advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, disagrees with the points paragraph is making under the following given reasons.
First reason being the wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills a group can reach than the individuals. They will also work faster and way more coefficient. Professor explain that after six months of trying said approach, every team had a free ride individual and the ones that tried hard on the task in hand were not satisfied given that no names were named and their job was took for granted. Also it did not help with the speed of the work, since the workers spent too much time to make consciences and took them too long to make groups.
Secondly, chances of a group making creative and risky decisions is way more possible than when they are working apart. the teacher believes that's a false idea since in the company when an idea didn't work the members dropped it immediately and took on a new path.
Third, team work tends to be rewarding for the people taking part in it. They are given a voice to carry out their arguments and not feel that they are just doing the job that was given to them by someone else. professor explains that in the given example whenever some members believed the solution doesn't work others ignored them and carried on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 75 | view |
- Passage believes dinosaurs are endotherms professor disagrees 83
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team the professor disagrees with this idea why 75
- why does the professor disagree with teamwork 3
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- professor disagrees with the passage that says traditional encyclopedias are better than the communal online ones 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...ter and way more coefficient. Professor explain that after six months of trying said ap...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...t no names were named and their job was took for granted. Also it did not help with ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 403, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...med and their job was took for granted. Also it did not help with the speed of the w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...sible than when they are working apart. the teacher believes thats a false idea sin...
^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...are working apart. the teacher believes thats a false idea since in the company when ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... idea since in the company when an idea didnt work the members dropped it immediately...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...that was given to them by someone else. professor explains that in the given example when...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ever some members believed the solution doesnt work others ignored them and carried on...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, third, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.752 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30920245973 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3508588916 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19205008024 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738237753815 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779202052698 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124873176556 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877060687247 0.0443174109184 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.