assembles a group of people into a team
The reading passage state that assembles a group of people into a team has several advantages. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in reading.
First, the article considers a wider range of knowledge and expertise of members in the team, with this advantage the group can work more quickly in response to the tasks. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains based on research on some teams and finding that in that situation some of the member free ride in the group and didn't contribute in their tasks, also the management in the team is so hard and consequently every time there is a delay during the tasks.
Second, the reading claims that team members are quick in assemble and performing the project. Admittedly the professor justified the information presented in the article and makes the point that in team working you must spend must of the time building agreement between members in the conversations and learn them how to run the project.
Third, the author in the reading puts forward the idea that an individual team member has a much better chance to shine. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that this advantage may be made a problem with ignoring some members in the team and its not so pleasant for the team's members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-25 | Elhamsarvari | 65 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...eams and finding that in that situation some of the member free ride in the group and didnt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...f the member free ride in the group and didnt contribute in their tasks, also the man...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: MUST_OF_THE_TIME_MOST_OF_THE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'most of the time'?
Suggestion: most of the time
...int that in team working you must spend must of the time building agreement between members in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76419213974 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49390477575 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53711790393 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9093625624 49.2860985944 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317824283065 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15190084052 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169554891709 0.0662205650399 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198424427385 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119970676502 0.0443174109184 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.0289183223 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.