Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons
Both the passages are about whether people can colonize on asteroids. While the author believes that asteroid would be the best option for several reasons, the lecturer casts doubt on the author's view and illustrates why he considers that this notion can be successful.
First of all, the author claims that the low gravity allows the craft to land on it more safely. Moreover, he says that the low gravity enables people to carry more equipment to build up the colony. These points, however, is challenged by the lecturer. The professor points out that the low gravity presents some risks too. When people stay in the low gravity environment for few months, people will suffer some illness such as loss of muscle and bone density. Therefore, this contradicts what is stated in the reading article.
Secondly, the author asserts that people can make tremendous profit from mining on the asteroid. Yet, this argument is rebutted by the lecturer. The lecturer refutes that the expensive cost to transmits the metals will reduce the profit. Meanwhile, when the quantity of the metals is increasing, the price of the precious metals will be decreasing.
Then people cannot make stable profit form this mining industry. Again, this idea directly disproves the author's view.
Finally, the author maintains that asteroids are easy to reach. He notes that some asteroids will get closer to the Earth periodically, making people easier to arrive on the asteroids. The lecturer, on the other hand, refuses this idea by mentioning that the asteroids might move away, and it will become much difficult for people to get back from the asteroids. The professor points out that the asteroids not always stay the same distance to the Earth. Consequently, the author's argument is disproved by the lecturer.
In conclusion, although the author believes that people can make several benefits from colonize on asteroid, all of the ideas are disapproved by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kalima | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Bonjourkmm | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Amirreza97 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Amirreza97 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | bishal sitaula | 66 | view |
- It is necessary to be competitive in order to succeed in life 90
- Students should go to college and university right after high school graduation. 73
- TPO52IntegratedTask-Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to use land for human needs than to use land for saving endangered animals. 76
- students should choose a university major that prepares them for high paying careers 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 39, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
... Then people cannot make stable profit form this mining industry. Again, this idea ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 474, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...istance to the Earth. Consequently, the authors argument is disproved by the lecturer. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 110, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ral benefits from colonize on asteroid, all of the ideas are disapproved by the lecturer. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.171875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53663585963 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8280707181 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.75 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751242059254 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254446003517 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266186228359 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441992131346 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295873368595 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.