Spending money on travelling is better than saving money for the future.
During the travelling, people can relieve the burden from the daily life and their anxiety. On the other hand, travelling also requires large sum of money which makes travelers worry about their future plan. Therefore, to strike a balance between the demand and expense becomes a pivotal issue. In my opinion, we should only go travelling without risking our latter’s life, avoiding falling into financial difficulty is our priority.
To begin with, youngsters are too naive on making financial decisions to easily cause financial burden. Young people, who only start entering the society, have less experiences to help them planning future and often tend to spend money on unnecessary stuff. Travelling is one of the sectors that youngsters may spend extravagantly on. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was young, I spent tremendous amount of money on journey with my friends which often forces me into a tight budget situation.
After undergoing numerous such embarrassed circumstances, I learn about how to allocate my money judiciously especially on travelling.
Second, life is full of unexpected emergencies which means that we should well-prepared for the future. If youngsters could develop a habit of saving money, they do not have to be anxious toward the unexpected circumstances and can maintain their original financial plan. For instance, my uncle, who expects that travelling around the world 5 years ago, suffered serious disease one years before his departure. The unexpected disease cost him large amount of saving. Yet, he still alive after several expensive treatment. This all attributes to his good habit of saving money. Suppose that he spent money travelling in the past, he might not made it this time.
In the light of the above-mentioned arguments, I am convinced that spending money on travelling only cause one to have an uncertain future. By contrast, saving money for the future leads to a well-prepared life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-03 | 57454751 | 83 | view |
| 2021-04-26 | Mithun Chandra Banik | 83 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | Safa Arshad | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-05 | Isidora | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | FarhadEbrahimi | 90 | view |
- It is necessary to be competitive in order to succeed in life 90
- It is more important to keep your old friend than it is to make new friends. 71
- Students should go to college and university right after high school graduation. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to use land for human needs than to use land for saving endangered animals. 76
- Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society, so this kind of information should be banned in the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun experiences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o only start entering the society, have less experiences to help them planning futur...
^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to plan' or 'plan'.
Suggestion: to plan; plan
...ety, have less experiences to help them planning future and often tend to spend money on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 380, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one year', 'a year', or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: one year; a year; years
...d 5 years ago, suffered serious disease one years before his departure. The unexpected di...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27215189873 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88519445788 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3887900915 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6842105263 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330604732656 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922400377782 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828912240161 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190114262914 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105430053454 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.