bees nest
In the lecture the professor made several points about feasibility of nests built by bees 200 million years ago. However, the reading passage describes dubious evidence about bees nest. The professors’ lecture casts doubt on the reading on account of the following reasons.
First, the professor states that absence of fossil has little to do with nest constructed by bees dating back 200 million years ago. The professor explains that bees fossil could be maintained in trees with the resin which were rare those years and such a tree are commonplace in modern day. Indeed, bees could not preserve in fossil remain since ancient trees could not produce a resin. In contrast, the reading mentions that absence of fossil remains is distributed to the fact that there were not actual bees.
second , the professor clarifies that early bees were more probably feed on other trees such as pine trees and developing of the trees in later times brings about such as a relationship between flowering plants and bees .on the other hand, the reading passage claims that absence of flowering plant is a convincing evidence to believe that there were not any bees.
Second, the professor is talking about modern bees that protect their chamber nests by waterproof substances with distinctive chemical composition. In other word, watertight substance in fossilized structure of early bees demonstrates that they might use this substance to cover their nest as modern bees. On the contrary, the reading passage highlights that lace of nests bees’ details seems to bring many doubtfull evidences to existence of early bees in those period.
In sum up, the professor's talking refutes that information of the reading passage. Non existence of trees with resin, feeding on trees other than flowering trees and protecting the nests without cap illustrate that about non existence of bees 200 million years is in doubt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-19 | hind aljubori | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-02 | elhamzafsharian | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | mr3pac | 3 | view |
| 2016-12-31 | sepide | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
... years ago. The professor explains that bees fossil could be maintained in trees wit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... fact that there were not actual bees. second , the professor clarifies that early be...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...that there were not actual bees. second , the professor clarifies that early bees...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...onship between flowering plants and bees .on the other hand, the reading passage c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast, such as, talking about, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18064516129 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58837051331 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.540411800872 92% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8860044316 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377355595344 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169744838913 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123073946913 0.0662205650399 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240520579667 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111773994446 0.0443174109184 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.