Cane toads' spreading may be prevented by several measures
This material addresses the question of the spread of the cane toad species in Australia. The reading passage suggests that there are effective and relatively safe measures to prevent them from /the/ further spread/ing/. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that those means are either unsuccessful or dangerous for the environment.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that national fence may be build to secure the parts of Australia which have not yet been colonized by these animals, especially since there is already some relevant experience. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues rivers and streams might be used by cane toads to enter the territory behind the fence.
Additionally, the article posits that the animals under consideration may be killed by volunteers - Australian citizens. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, she mentions that untrained people may not be able to differ cane toads from native frogs and harm the population of the latter.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that a special virus will be designed to eliminate the toads and which will not harm other species. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, the use of the virus may lead to ecological disasters since it may also kill cane toads in their native habitats in Central and South America where they are an essential part of ecosystem. According to the lecturer, the virus may be brought to the other continent by the toads infected in Australia and transported by collectors for example.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-05 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-05 | Safa Arshad | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | habib | 76 | view |
| 2020-02-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | mahdian_m | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access not on public transportation? 70
- TPO 36- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universit 73
- For success in a future job it is more important to relate well with others than to study hard in school 43
- The professor controverts all the points that have been made by the author of the reading passage, he also discredits all the main arguments presented in the reading by providing rational reasons. The reading discusses about the wood companies that conser 3
- TPO 45- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on to the fact that a special virus will be designed to eliminate the toads and w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, so, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22097378277 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73684300715 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3530962637 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.727272727 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329517748489 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113606478058 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661815570599 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180824810959 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193420632663 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.