the chevalier's escape from the prison
The reading and the lecture are about the accuracy of the memoir written by chevalier. The author provides three theories about the accuracy of this memoir. The professor on the other hand is not convinced of this and casts doubt on the theories presented in the reading. He is of the opinion that this memoir is exactly accurate and precise.
To begin with, the author argues that the chevalier could not be as wealthy as he has described in his memoir. To be more specific, the article mentions that based on the evidence, the chevalier had borrowed a lot of money, so, he would not be so rich then. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. According to the professor, the chevalier was really affluent as he has claimed and he spent a huge amount of money on his parties and gambles. Indeed, he earned this money by selling his properties; therefore, earning this money took a longer time and the chevalier was coerced to borrow money until having access to his own money.
Secondly, the writer disputes, that chevaliers written record in the memoir between himself and Voltaire cannot be reliable somehow. To delineate, the article mentions that the chevalier has written this conversation after a long time passing from it, hence, he would not be able to remember the precise dialogue and conversation passed between them. The lecturer, on the other hand, opposes this notion by asserting that although the memoir has been writing years after meeting Voltaire however, the chevalier had recorded their conversation exactly the nights that they had talked. Therefore, it can be inferred that these records deserve to trust on them.
Finally, the author averts that the chevalier had a better choice to escape from the prison. Moreover, it is stated in the article that since he had loyal friends who could helped him to get away from the prison; notwithstanding, he did not require to demolish the prison’s ceiling in order to get away. In contrast, the lecture’s position is that this solution was not practical. The professor puts forth to the idea that other prisoners could not escape from the prison in spite of having reliable friends. Also, the lecturer presented this fact that, based on the documents the ceiling of the prison requires repairs right after his escape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | EdenWu | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | Naveena0 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | anman | 80 | view |
- do you agree or this agree with the following statement people are initially leader and do not need to learn to be a leader 90
- The reading and the lecture are both about the value of television appearances by university professors The author of the reading argues that they are very worthwhile for academics and their universities The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the 68
- it is better to learn from those at your own level like students or people at higher level like teachers 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 83
- likely disadvantages of selling fossils to the private sellers 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ries about the accuracy of this memoir. The professor on the other hand is not conv...
^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'demolishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: demolishing
...on; notwithstanding, he did not require to demolish the prison’s ceiling in order to get aw...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in contrast, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 22.412803532 210% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 388.0 270.72406181 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93298969072 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54091296734 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489690721649 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5248874847 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268207520352 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086545277855 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130608322292 0.0662205650399 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153278576332 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158208093157 0.0443174109184 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.