Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has become a valuable historical source about European society in the eighteenth century. However, some critics have raised doubts about the accuracy of the memoir. They claim that the Chevalier distorted or invented many events in the memoir to make his life seem more exciting and glamorous than it really was.
The writing is about a memoir written by a famous but controversial figure, Chervalier de Seingalt. Since Chervalier met many important figures in the 18th century, the memoir is a good source of history of that time. But the writing casts doubts on the validity of the memoir with three claims. However, in the lecture ,the lecturer refutes these claims.
Firstly, The writing claims that the claim made by the memoir about Chevalier being very wealthy and speanding a great deal of money on parties and gambling, is false. This is because they claim that records show that Chavalier borrowed money from a Swiss merchant. The lecturer, However, refutes this claim by stating that Chavalier indeed possesed weath in the form of land and other possessions. But in order for him to spend money, he had to sell these posessions.so he resorted to borrowing to hold the parties. So borrowing doesnot make Chevalier poor.
Secondly, the writing claims that the conversations between Chavalier and Voltair had to have been inaccurate because the conversation happened a year before the memoir was written. And since it is almost impossible to rememeber a conversation word for word after such a long time it must have been inaccurate. Nevertheless, the lecturer disagrees, expounding that Chavalier was known to have kept journals every night after conversations. Hence, must have recorded his conversations with Voltair and later used these recording when finishing the memoir.
Lastly, the writing casts doubt on how Chavalier escaped Venice prison in Italy. They claim that Chavalier's claim that he made an escape by making a hole in the ceiling is false and he used bribes inorder to escape. However, the lecturer again defends Chavalier story stating that his story must have been true for two reasons. Firstly, he says that there were other prisoners who had more political connects than Chavalier but yet could not bribe their way out of the prison. Secondly, there are records in venice that mentions repairs of the cieling of the cell holding Chavalier. Thus, Chavalier must have escaped from the ceiling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-10 | Naveena0 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | anman | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | anman | 80 | view |
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 67
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 83
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a 60
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th three claims. However, in the lecture ,the lecturer refutes these claims. Firs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10115606936 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63621365594 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537572254335 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0578175294 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8947368421 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146195186308 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458451924358 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486920508709 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927513918326 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486540007949 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.