Coal Ash integrated essay top 41 (second version)
Both the reading and the listening are about coal ash. The reading passage believes that new rules on coal ash might not be the best idea. The professor says that new rules are necessary.
First of all, The reading points out that strict regulations for companies on coal ash already exist. The reading says that companies use linear in landfills to prevent coal ash leakage. On the other hand, the professor says that this regulation only applies to new disposal ponds. However, with old landfills, there is coal ash leakage into the drinking water. This shows the current regulations are not enough.
By standing in the middle between both arguments, I agree with the environmentalists's opinion. Because when we talk about environment, we must keep in mind that the environment is a prior. The whole world is approaching to set new rules and regulations which protect our environment from additional damages. In other words, let's stop ruining our environment and and offer clean environment for the next generations.
Secondly, and referring to power companies argument, I would say that the existence of strong regulations and rules is not necessarily that additional regulations are not needed. Also offering some privileges for existing positive coal ash industries is recommended.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ords, lets stop ruining our environment and and offer clean environment for the next ge...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ions. Secondly, and referring to power companies argument, I would say that the existenc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... additional regulations are not needed. Also offering some privileges for existing p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, secondly, so, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23188405797 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8971735859 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4493437847 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3571428571 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133014313083 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055533952188 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653559000958 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891093379021 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059211719849 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.