consequences of reading less literature.
The article introduced in the topic is the effects of reading less literature. The writer states that reading less novels, plays and poems have unfortunate effects in culture whereas speaker refute this statement and attack each of the claims made in reading passage.
The writer firstly introduced the fact by saying that decline in book reading impacts the intellectual stimulation. He believes that literature encourages us to exercise imagination, empathize with others and etc. On the other part, the speaker states on this point that reading books doesn't guarantee intellectual growth. There are number of other good literature sources based on science, political articles which are well written up and provides high quality to readers.
The reading passage mentions that now days people are more likely to watch television or music videos instead of reading books which is lowering the level of culture whereas the speaker argue this by saying that there is plenty of sources like music, movies which provides the intellectual culture. Hence by reading and listening other sources doesn't lower the standard culture.
By addition to other points, writer says that reading less literature impacting on writers too, that publishers invest less and this caused few serious writer to come. On the other hand, speaker believes that the impact on writers is the author's fault as modern literature is difficult to understand due to people read less which is impacting investment.
As we can see writer and speaker hold different views on the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun novels is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...erature. The writer states that reading less novels, plays and poems have unfortunat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of the claims made in reading passage. The writer firstly introduced the fact by s...
^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...cise imagination, empathize with others and etc. On the other part, the speaker states o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...states on this point that reading books doesnt guarantee intellectual growth. There ar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hich provides the intellectual culture. Hence by reading and listening other sources ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... by reading and listening other sources doesnt lower the standard culture. By additio...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ON_ADDITION[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in'?
Suggestion: In
...ces doesnt lower the standard culture. By addition to other points, writer says t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28340080972 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53432887807 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0877348134 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301389031877 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126399765657 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792764033042 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160090075603 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103476038278 0.0443174109184 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.