Were dinosaurs Reptiles or Endotherms?
Both the reading passage and lecturer discusses whether the dinosaurs are endotherms or not. The former argues that there are three features of dinosaurs to consider them as endotherms whereas the lecture in listening passage contradicts each of these points.
First of all, the author of the passage claims that fossils found on polar region of dinosaurs proves that they are active in cold temperature. However, the lecturer contends that, he believes that it might be possible that they moved to other place. He goes to say that like reptiles who hibernate or migrate to warmer place in cold temperature, it is possibility that dinosaurs were moved to less cold region.
Secondly, the text asserts that the position of two legs in below part of body maintains dinosaurs to do physical activity which suggests the feature of endotherms. Nevertheless, the listening counters that this structure of leg in dinosaurs body supports the heavy weight for upper body, which gives other advantage of being large animal.
At last, in reading passage states that dinosaurs have haversian canal system which allows them to grow quicker, which allows them to to qualified for endotherms. In contrast, the lecturer contends this point and says that dinosaurs also have growth rings in their body system. He adds up the argument by saying that these rings are responsible to random growth like stopping the growth and then show rapid growth again which doesn't allow this evidence for calling dinosaurs endotherms.
In conclusion, as we can see both lecturer and writer holds very different view on the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...e of leg in dinosaurs body supports the heavy weight for upper body, which gives other advan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...them to grow quicker, which allows them to to qualified for endotherms. In contrast, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... and then show rapid growth again which doesnt allow this evidence for calling dinosau...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13409961686 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54778612977 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.814720645 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239129079265 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856403703158 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704364008169 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106752193339 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739934933079 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.