First, it is doubtful that computerized voting machine would enable everyone to vote easier. Despite of those who master in computer, voters who do not expertise in computer or unable to afford a computer inevitably exist. For these specific voters, utilizing computer for voting could result in additional constraints.
Second, utilizing computer system to count votes will not eliminate errors; while it might potentially cause critical mistakes. As a matter of fact, computer system is programmed by human, which introduce the probability of the emergence of human errors. In addition, due to the system centralize all the votes together for processing, once an error occurred, it could cause numerous votes being lost.
Regarding to the application of computer technology in banking transactions, one must aware that such system was not initially flawless. The functioning frequency of the transaction system greatly outnumbered the voting system, which is only enabled once a year. Therefore, the transaction system obtained sufficient debugging opportunities to achieve its current stability; however, a testing and improving for voting system is far less sufficient for it to be used in an election event with such an importance.
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 78
- Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an election is closely contested Those critics would like the traditional systems 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, therefore, while, in addition, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 189.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57671957672 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.985880756 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645502645503 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1477507532 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280288435812 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113756685034 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674335268639 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18248502761 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572040966962 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.42419426049 125% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.