Undoubtedly, history of first bees on the world is a controversial thing among scientists. More specifically, the writer puts forth on the claim that there were no bees 200 million years ago on the planet earth. However the professor point out that the are some serious flaws with the writer's claim. She more or less addresses the problem with each point made in the reading.
To begin with, the writer claims that no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago. But the professor refutes with this point and says that bees bodies can turn into the fossils only in proppers resin from special trees, but in that period of time, no trees with that kinda resin existed.
Secondly, the author points out that there was no flowering plants in that period, and since bees and flowering plants have evolved a close, mutually dependent biological relationship, it is unlikely bees could have existed in that time. The professor, not surprisingly though, believes that bees were feeding from none-flowering plants back then. She thinks bees were adapted to todays flowering plants as their main food later.
Finally, the reading states that structures of founded fossils lack some details, for example, chambers of modern bee nests are closed by caps that have a spiral pattern, but the fossilized chambers lack such caps. Then again, the professor stays on the other side of the argument and says that maybe there are some differences between current nests champers and those from that period, but studies showed that both of them have the same water-proof material in them.
In conclusion the author and the professor hold opposing views about fossils of bee nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... million years ago on the planet earth. However the professor point out that the are so...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...h. However the professor point out that the are some serious flaws with the writers cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s resin from special trees, but in that period of time, no trees with that kinda resin existed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99300699301 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39088239911 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6180005973 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273010813357 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993018542886 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096568218977 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142315380414 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486595838228 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.