Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200-million-year-old fossilized trees in the state of Arizona in the southwestern United States. However, many skeptics doubt that the structures were created by bees. The skeptics support their view with several arguments.
The article states that the several skeptics' argument about the old fossil that referred to bees support the idea that this structure not were created by bees, and provide three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that not only is it possible that the bees made this structure perfectly, but is the theory unconvincing as well, and refutes each author's reasons.
First of all, the reading states that the preserved bee fossil have shown 100 million years years old thereby the 200 million years fossil is nothing to do with the bees nest. The professor refutes this point by stating that the fossil might have been to bees inasmuch as probability of presence of other Resin material strengthen existence of bee in 200 million years ago.
Second, the article claims that the flowering plant did not live in 200 years ago where in Given the bees' close association with flowering plants, it is unlikely bees could have existed before that time. However, the professor contends that the bees might feed on other non-flowering plant such as pine trees, hence, the bees might have adopted to feed after evolving the flowering plant.
Third, the reading avers that Given the bee nest were made by other insects, such as wood-boring beetles, for the fossilized chamber lacks caps. the professor opposes this point by declaring that chemical cap have a special characteristic in which by using the chemical analysis can recognize spiral caps material in such fossil caps found in 200 million years ago
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skeptics'' or 'skeptic's'?
Suggestion: skeptics'; skeptic's
The article states that the several skeptics argument about the old fossil that refe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: years
...erved bee fossil have shown 100 million years years old thereby the 200 million years foss...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hown 100 million years years old thereby the 200 million years fossil is nothing ...
^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... for the fossilized chamber lacks caps. the professor opposes this point by declari...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, second, so, then, third, well, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38289272788 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519841269841 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.0416254125 49.2860985944 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 158.625 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454511292232 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199333212879 0.0996497079465 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10986144836 0.0662205650399 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26339021802 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117783425702 0.0443174109184 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.