Nowadays, our society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence and a sizzling economy. How to improve people's living standards is still a hotly-discussed concern. Some people advocate that government should distribute more money to support art museums and music performances, while others hold the reverse viewpoint that more money is supposed to be allocated to the development of recreational facilities. Personally speaking, I believe it is too rash to label any option as superior, and both are equally momentous.
On the one hand, recreational facilities such as playgrounds and swimming pools enable the masses to build their body and unwind themselves. It is undeniable that health comes top of the list. Living in a high-speed society, people rarely have time and chances to stretch out their arms and legs. Sitting in front of the computers all day and night exerts some detrimental effects on their physical health, causing eye strains and leading to chronic illnesses at even a young age. Even worse, it still is enormously difficult for some workers and students to readily find a place to relax in many cities and regions. If the government invests money to erect more recreational facilities, people are granted the chance to possess a robust body through workouts. For example, my father works in a bank and is always enslaved by the exhaustion caused by daily work. When walking in the new park established by the local government, he can refresh himself. Moderate exercise help accelerate his blood circulation, making him live a healthier life.
On the other hand, art museums and musical performances are also of vital importance to enrich the public cultural life. Manifold exhibitions in museums prompt residents to improve their aesthetical tastes. When immersed in the art world, people can easily enjoy various masterpieces and have a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of diversified cultures. Moreover, those facilities even offer some wonderful opportunities for teachers to educate their students. These art activities facilitate outdoor education, motivating students to turn what they have learned in class into practice. For example, when I was in primary school, the only way we learned about paintings and music was by reading dull learning materials and textbooks. After visiting the new museums and theaters built by our government, we could effortlessly comprehend the essence and spirit delivered by the artists on the ground that the knowledge we assimilated can be demonstrated in a more vivid way, which paves a way for our further development. Inspired by this experience, we indulged in art and even created our innovative artworks with ease.
In a nutshell, either of the options should be valued equally. Since our society is developing and the quality of life is still treasured by most people, the government needs to spare no efforts to satisfy the different requirements of the citizens and help people have overall development in terms of different aspects.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform. 83
- Do you agree with the following statement? Do people benefit more from traveling in their own country than in a foreign country? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to spend money on traveling and vacation than save money for the future 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 7.30242825607 301% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2568.0 1373.03311258 187% => OK
No of words: 482.0 270.72406181 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32780082988 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.04702891845 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98049535469 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 145.348785872 200% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601659751037 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 803.7 419.366225166 192% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.25165562914 559% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0209344168 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.652173913 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 4.33554083885 392% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200570860951 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449902768442 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644048122209 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101620215922 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541542144644 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 63.6247240618 247% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.