doctors
The author provide 3 benefits of electronic medical record system. The lecturer do not accept these advantajous. She is of the opinion that none of these benefits is certain.
First of all, the author suggest that utilizing electronic records decrease the cost of storage space for paper records. This statement is challenged by the lecturer. She states that doctors even who use electronic system use use paper records as an emercency back up and for having documents for ligal reasons, hence, by using electronic system the cost of storage space still remains.
Secondly, the writer contends that medical errors will be declined if doctors use electronic system instead of paper records. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that doctors usually take note by hands and then office staff enter the nots in electronic sysyems. So there are still some causes that can create errors.
Finally, it states in the article that medical records on electronic system can help researchs in this field to have a good database, in order to draw out the required information about patient and to access the information from different location. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that by mentioning that to gather the patient information doctors sholud gain permission from their patients and also
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | sarah1378 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: use
... doctors even who use electronic system use use paper records as an emercency back up a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... permission from their patients and also
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23696682464 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54359796615 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5627654313 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15982395299 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576501639375 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788345943244 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985554066877 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797756306845 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.