Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing TaskGlass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every

Essay topics:

Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task

Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.

One-Way Glass

One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.

Colorful Designs

A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.

Magnetic Field

The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic held to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions-either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.

The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the problem of glass windowes for birds, which makes enormous birds are killed. In the readig part the author mentions that there are several solution for the problem that can contributed to control the dead of birds becouse of the class windowes. In the listening part, however, the speaker challenges what the author states and rebutes the reasons.

To behing with, as mentioned in the article, the author sets forth that one-way glasses could be effective. In these windowes,although people can see throughout the windowe from inside of the buldings, birds cannot see the glass so they can fly away. Nevertheless, the professor refuts the reasosn asserting that it acts just like mirrore and birds can watch the reflect of the sky or reflect of the tree and fly on the mirror; therefore, the solution is not effective and cannot stopes the birds.

Seconly, the writer points out that colorful designs of the windowe and drawing lines and stripes through the glass windowe could be useful for stoping birds; nonetheless, the lecturer flatly contradicts the idea and contends that colorful regular glasses should be worked when the window is open and should the window is open, the bird would take it as a whole to fly through it and it would kill them too. Indeed, the whole should be extrimly small to preseve bird ro fly on it, wherase, for people inside the bulding this small hole makes the room too dark.

Finally, the author claims that bird have magnetic system when they fly and human can use the magnetic for buldings to change the direct of flght to the oather path. In contrast, the professor is off the opinion that magnetic field is used just for long destances. For example, when they want to fly to from a cold place to a warmer situation, they might use their abilities; whereas, scientist found out that magnetic ability is not used on the short distances, and they utilize their eyes in a near distances for traveling in the city, hence it would not effective for them.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
...part the author mentions that there are several solution for the problem that can contributed to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , although
...es could be effective. In these windowes,although people can see throughout the windowe f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s just like mirrore and birds can watch the reflect of the sky or reflect of the tree and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 503, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'distance'?
Suggestion: distance
..., and they utilize their eyes in a near distances for traveling in the city, hence it wou...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79320113314 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38203369758 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521246458924 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5778281291 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.818181818 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0909090909 21.698381199 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493896246868 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167983942042 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982286105327 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270539925512 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619402486068 0.0443174109184 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.