Experts have been discussing whether a law restricting the importing, buying and selling of nonnative species should be abolished.
Experts have been discussing whether a law restricting the importing, buying and selling of nonnative species should be abolished. The passage opposes the law because it forces pet owners to turn their pets over, spends a lot to implement, and applies a single standard to the entire country. However, the lecture finds all three criticisms unreasonable.
Firstly, the lecture asserts that the law won’t have an affect on pet owners. Although some people owned pets that are nonnative to the environment, the law was aimed to control the number of buying of nonnative species. For example, if people kept tropical fish as pet, the government won’t taken them away, but to control the buying of such animal since it is nonnative to the country. Therefore, pet owners are allowed to keep their pets as long as they won’t damage the entire eco-system.
Secondly, the lecture claims that the financial loss caused by the law is worthy. Although the law may have expenditure on checking the safety studies of pets, a more portion of the expenditure will be used in eliminating existing harmful species. For example, many pythons, which are native to Asia, search their way into the wild after being abandoned by its owners and destroys many native species in the country. As a result, the government was forced to spend money on removing the species than safety checks.
Finally, the lecture undermines the idea that the law is unfair to be applied to the entire country. Although species like the Brazilian rabbit pose little threat to areas where it wasn’t used to live, there are other factors which in fact poses a greater threat to the native animals. Just take the Brazilian rabbit for example, it carries a special type of disease that other native species cannot defense. As the disease spread around the country, 99% of the native animals were threatened to death, which brings them to the near vicinity of extinction. Consequently, the law should be seen as a standard in every part of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-02 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[2]
Message: Did you mean 'effect' (=influence)?
Suggestion: effect
...ture asserts that the law won’t have an affect on pet owners. Although some people own...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9587020649 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53305949198 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522123893805 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9653933701 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287282305731 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102259983706 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177471972273 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183733681372 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123518691912 0.0443174109184 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.