Enjoyment
People have different views about whether to enjoy immediately or delay the enjoyment. Actually, the choice is determined by his lifestyle and goals. Did people really spend too much time on self-enjoyment? According to my observation, most people use a lot of time on what they need to do rather than self-enjoyment.
A person's lifestyle is working, private time, then sleeping. They need to work from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., which is eight hours, and may use a part of their private time to catch up. They work to earn money, to get food, a house to live in, earn a respectable life, and maybe save some money for future use. This means that a person spends eight hours on what is needed for them to do, and possibly another hour or two on transportation. Through simple calculation, we can see that doing meaningful things costs more than one-third of a day's time.
A person's goal is about something similar to a happy and healthy life. Everyone's goals are different, but their bottom line is to have a house shelter to stay and something food to eat, and this needs the stability of their jobs. To be compete competitive in the workplace, most use their private time to learn extra knowledge, and this is another form of what they need to do. Others use part of their time exercising. This can be seen as both an enjoyment and what people need to do. A happy feeling and a healthy body can improve the efficiency of working and can increase the quality of life. So actually, a lot of private time is actually spent doing what must be needed.
To sum up, because of their working lifestyles and having a steady income and a happy life as a goal, people won't spend too much time on pure personal enjoyment. So, if you have already finished your work, in private time, you don't need to carry a psychological burden for doing what you want, because they are what you should do.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | sonyeoso | 85 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 85 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | fmichela | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Alana Gerber | 80 | view |
- Pterosaurs 90
- Pterosaurs 68
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society toregard any living man or woman as a hero 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Younger school children ages five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
- Pterosaurs 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...to do rather than self-enjoyment. A persons lifestyle is working, private time, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...re than one-third of a days time. A persons goal is about something similar to a ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...inished your work, in private time, you dont need to carry a psychological burden fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, really, so, then, third, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53823529412 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57875771438 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538235294118 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6943148279 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7222222222 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.077196299138 0.236089414692 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03856858919 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863383657878 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063211852109 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798498824647 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.