fine lines seen in Sinosauropteryx's fossil which was preserved in volcanic ash
Both the reading and the lecture discuss fine lines seen in Sinosauropteryx's fossil which was preserved in volcanic ash and talk about the interpretation of those fine lines as evidence of existence of feather in Sinosauropteryx's anatomy structure. The reading mentions three reasons made by some critics. They have denied the existence of feather in Sinosauropteryx resulting of fine lines on the skeletons of them. The professor disagrees with the idea presented in reading and denies each reason of it.
In the first place, the passage states that the fine line is rooted in the decomposition of Sinosauropteryx's dead body. In the critics view such a fine line couldn't represent the structure of a living dinosaur but it could result from the skin fibers after decomposition. The professor refutes this by noting that any animal placed same as Sinosauropteryx didn't show any decomposition and even their bodies preserved in a good way in volcanic ash. She saw their alleged inconceivable.
Secondly, according to passage, such a fine line is more probable to remain of frills, another part of a dinosaur's structure. The professors contradict this by pointing out to the result of chemical analysis of Sinosauropteryx's fine line. It indicated that the fine line's chemical are the same of Sinosauropteryx's feather chemical, not frills.
Thirdly, the reading contends that place of the fine lines in this skeleton isn't in the place in which the flying of Sinosauropteryx, usual function of feathers, prove. The professors reject this alleged by saying that the feathers have different function. She provides an example of a specific bird that has colorful feathers on their tail. They use it to attract mate. She uses of this example to illustrate one probable function of Sinosauropteryx's feathers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | Hello GRE | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | Sommy2021 | 83 | view |
| 2022-02-10 | Alia Mahbob | 87 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | wally | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | mohammad Gh | 3 | view |
- solutions to get rid of dangerous 3
- it is more important to keep old friends than make new friends 73
- whether or not governments must take improving internet access more weighty than improving public transportation 70
- agree or disagree? today young people have better abilities to make decisions than pas young people 90
- whether or not societies rules related to the young to follow are extremely strict 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y. In the critics view such a fine line couldnt represent the structure of a living din...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...y animal placed same as Sinosauropteryx didnt show any decomposition and even their b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the fine lines chemical are the same of Sinosauropteryxs feather chemical, not f...
^^
Line 6, column 77, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...lace of the fine lines in this skeleton isnt in the place in which the flying of Sin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25951557093 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22901338804 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532871972318 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5162066574 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379150278797 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109367530344 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136519969089 0.0662205650399 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226367917872 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106875579621 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.