formation of Carolina Bay whether it is caused by a meteorite impact
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading passage in the formation of Carolina Bay whether it is cause by a meteorite impact. First of all, the reading says that the depressions are asymmetrical and meteorite craters are observed to have this phenomenon. However, the listening argues that water flow is also a cause of the Carolina Bay when water travel over to places in a ling period of time. besides, evidences had found that the absence of groundwater in this region. As a result, the Carolina Bay might be other causes instead of meteorite impacts.
Secondly, the reading implies that researchers have found that most sand is thinly coat with iron, but the surrounding sand does not contain any iron. Only meteorite impacts burn and melt the iron out of the sand. On the other hand, the listening suggests that it is true that some part of the sand does not contain any iron. However, when the high heat melt the iron, glass will be formed, but sand does not contain any glass. Moreover, many other chemical reaction can also take the iron away from the sand. In other words, the formation of Carolina Bay is more likely to cause by other chemical reactions instead of meteorite impacts.
Last but not least, the reading asserts that buckyballs had been found at Carolina Bay and buckyballs are made by meteorite explosion. However, the listening indicates that this hypothesis is incorrect. Buckyballs are only found in some specific parts of the Carolina Bay. If it is cause by meteorites impacts, buckyballs will be located spread among the Carolina Bay. Besides, there are other force that cause these buckyballs, such as lighting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- Agree or disagree? Getting advice from friends who are older than you is most valuable than getting advice from friends your same age. 66
- humperback whales 73
- The most important value to share with a young child 5 10 years old Helping others Honesty Being well organised 85
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning. 70
- Brochs 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...y when water travel over to places in a ling period of time. besides, evidences had ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n water travel over to places in a ling period of time. besides, evidences had found that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...ver to places in a ling period of time. besides, evidences had found that the absence ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time. besides, evidences had found that the absence of groundwater in this regio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.925 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50427950044 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478571428571 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9449909311 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1875 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400282370761 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144598266965 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16610725812 0.0662205650399 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295404160052 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139030384266 0.0443174109184 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.