fossil
The reading asserts that Sinosauropteryx doesn't possess feathers. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First, the author argues that the fine lines were the results of fossil decomposition which happened at the site. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that other animal fossils in that site were well-preserved and the possibility it is unlikely that this particular fossil becomes decomposed.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that by assuming the lines are not for decomposition, the exact anatomy still is not clear. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that frills and feathers are different in the chemical substances. And the laboratory experiments have shown that this fossil contains that particular protein that is of these two.
Finally, the reading questions the functionality of these feathers as it was near the tale and couldn't help the animal with flying or regulating body temperature. In contrast, the speaker dismisses due to the fact that there are other reasons for the functionality of feathers, for example, displaying and attracting male attention. Moreover, the feathers were colorful, which confirms this idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 68 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2024-01-16 | saamaan | 86 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he reading asserts that Sinosauropteryx doesnt possess feathers. The lecturer, however...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...se feathers as it was near the tale and couldnt help the animal with flying or regulati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49222797927 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95543968781 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8979433904 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205877880748 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746953635336 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118028871474 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118275089834 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142244957056 0.0443174109184 321% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.