Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window

The passage talks about that glass windows cause harm to the flying birds, and the author of the passage offers several solutions to the responsible businesses to use to prevent injuries to birds. However, the professor says that none of each solution will stop the birds' injuries, and she refutes each of the author's solution.
First of all, the passage claims that replace the regular glass to one-way glass would help birds to avoid getting through the glass window as birds would not see through a window. However, the professor contradicts this solution by saying that one-way glass can cause injuries to birds as one-way glass reflects like a mirror. So, birds would see the reflection of the sky and trees on the mirror, and they would fly through as a sky. Therefore, the one-way glass will not prevent birds injuries.
Second of all, the passage avers that businesses can paint windows with colorful lines or adding strips to prevent birds from flying through the glass. While, the professor opposes this solution by saying that birds would see the lines as open holes, so they would try flying to them and got hurt. The professor added that the practical solution for birds is only to prevent extremely small lines, but that would make the room too dark for occupants to live.
Third of all, the passage states that creating artificial magnetic field windows would help to guide the birds away from buildings. As birds actually use this technique to navigate. However, the professor opposed this solution, and she states that birds use the magnetic field to navigate only in long distances. And she gave evidence that when birds migrate from cold to warm temperature, they use the magnetic field to fly. But in short distances, they use their eyes to determine their destination. That's why; artificial magnetic field would not have much benefits to the birds.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...utions to the responsible businesses to use to prevent injuries to birds. However, ...
^^^
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...s injuries, and she refutes each of the authors solution. First of all, the passage cl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to guide the birds away from buildings. As birds actually use this technique to na...
^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ir eyes to determine their destination. Thats why; artificial magnetic field would no...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 554, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...rtificial magnetic field would not have much benefits to the birds.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, in short, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92721518987 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30597641775 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462025316456 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.504805612 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24205251072 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884236052707 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05823344945 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151882200904 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590202733641 0.0443174109184 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.