Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.
One-Way Glass
One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.
Colorful Designs
A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.
Magnetic Field
The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions—either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.
The article states that the glass used in the building are very dangerous for the birds as it cause the i passage provides three solution measures in order to reduce this harmful injuries to birds. However the professor refutes these all solution measures by stating that these all measures will not be effective as mentioned in the passage.
Firstly, the passage states that replacing of the regular, clear glass by the one way glass which is transparent in only in one direction will reduce in the birds injuries. However, the professor refutes this claim by stating that one way glass reflects as a mirror for the birds, so, the birds will not able to distinguish it. Sometime the glass reflects the picture of the sky and trees, due to which the birds may fly into it, which will result in the injuries to the birds.
Secondly, the passage claims that the use of colorful designs like a thin stripes paint or the any other painted patterns in the glass will result in the avoidation of the birds fly through the glass. In contrary, the professor refute this measures by stating that the opening that are left in the glass during the making of stripes for the observation by the people will cause the significant damage to birds. As the birds seem these opening as the whole and they try to fly through it. Opening should be completely painted but it will result in difficulty for people causing the darker room situation.
Thirdly, the passage states that creation of the artificial magnetic field will helps to guide the birds away from the building as the bird research show that they have ability to sense the magnetic field. But, the professor do not agree with this solution measure and he refute it by stating that the birds use the sense of magnetic field only when they used to travel for a long distance like migration from colder area to the warmer areas. During the shorter distance travel they used their eyes to find the direction, so, this measure will not work in this case.
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- Technology has made the world a better place to live 82
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'i'?
Suggestion: the; i
...ery dangerous for the birds as it cause the i passage provides three solution measure...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dangerous for the birds as it cause the i passage provides three solution measure...
^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... reduce this harmful injuries to birds. However the professor refutes these all solutio...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lorful designs like a thin stripes paint or the any other painted patterns in the...
^^
Line 13, column 81, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...n of the artificial magnetic field will helps to guide the birds away from the buildi...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 273, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
...agree with this solution measure and he refute it by stating that the birds use the se...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70738636364 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26848859 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434659090909 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.7139053688 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259260213543 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115835602265 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645414252261 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166756995554 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540386024665 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.