glasses of the building misleads birds and they fly through them. compare solutions from writing and listening.
The reading and the lecture are both about preventing birds to get harm when they try to fly through the mirrors of the buildings. The author of the reading feels that this can be prevented by three solutions. The lecturer challenges the claim made by the author. He is of the opinion that none of these solutions can be effective.
To begin with, the author argues that using one-way glasses which are transparent in only one direction, can make birds understand the solid form of the glass. The article mentions that this can prevent them from hitting to the glass. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that one-way glasses which reflect like mirror can mislead birds by showing sky and trees to them and they might fly through them. He believes that these glasses are as bad as regular glasses.
Secondly, the writer suggests that glasses can be painted by some pictures. In the article, it is said that people still can see out of the building through the openings in the design. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that this solution also has problem. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that if there will be some opening spaces in the painting, birds would still fly through that. Besides, if these wholes would be extremely small in order to avoid this happening, it is going to make the buildings too dark.
Finally, the author points that creating an artificial magnetic field can be efficient in guiding birds away from the buildings. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that magnetic field is not a good idea either. He notes that birds do not find their path in short distance by the use of magnetic field. They use their eyes in this way and they only use magnetic field for long-distance travelling.
- Should parents give money to their children for studying 73
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationships 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- Would you prefer interrupting the teachers and pointing out their mistakes or saying nothing 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is can be prevented by three solutions. The lecturer challenges the claim made by t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, in contrast, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75974025974 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42160783712 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0483816351 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4444444444 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257432100635 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756919125316 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747643373985 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149702924628 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709459064923 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.