go green
In this set of materials, the article and lecture both discuss go green policy. The writer strongly postulates that with this strategy people can reduce the carbon monoxide level in their environment by reducing waste production and increasing recycle products usage. However, the lecturer mentions that though this policy could be beneficial to earth but before realizing that few points need serious considerations.
First anf foremost, the writer begins by asserting that with going green environmental pollution can be reduced. It will not only control the waste production, but it also provides the time for nature to nurture back to a normal level. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts these points by insisting that go green policiy would not be effective with a single person's efforts.To be specific, It required mutual efforts of thousands of people and companies because waste production is result of multiple resources. Moreover, it is hard to convince such large number of multiple companies. As a result this approach is not realistic.
Furthermore, the lecturer posits that eco friendly products would not bring any profits to the company as they will loos the customers rather than gaining their trusts. This is due to the fact that eco friendly products' production would not be cheaper for companies. In order to balance their finance, companies increase the price of their products. Hence, customers will not utilize their services. This claim clearly refutes the writer implication that by producing eco friendly products company gains profits and wins customer' trust.
Ultimately, the writer wraps up the arguments by declaring that by going green people will not only save their environment but can also save their electricity costs. he gives the example of solar panels use to illustrate that. Not surprisingly, the lecture takes an issue with that by contending that solar panels installation would not be economical for customers. In addition their electricity bills would be skyrocketed after paying maintenance services for these soler panels. No one wants to spend that much money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...effective with a single persons efforts.To be specific, It required mutual efforts...
^^
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uch large number of multiple companies. As a result this approach is not realistic...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...is is due to the fact that eco friendly products production would not be cheaper for com...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... can also save their electricity costs. he gives the example of solar panels use t...
^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s. he gives the example of solar panels use to illustrate that. Not surprisingly, t...
^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'panels'' or 'panel's'?
Suggestion: panels'; panel's
...ssue with that by contending that solar panels installation would not be economical fo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...uld not be economical for customers. In addition their electricity bills would be skyroc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34131736527 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72879842627 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559880239521 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.3960342859 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1111111111 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164977048614 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555000983958 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107851286181 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114592398916 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772875306384 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.